Since late 2024, Georgian civil society has faced steadily mounting pressure from the Georgian Dream government. A series of laws modelled on Russia’s “foreign agents” framework now forces foreign-funded organisations to register, and since 2025 they need prior government consent to receive foreign grants. Meanwhile, state money has been steered towards loyal organisations. The authorities have frozen the bank accounts of watchdog groups, demanded donor and staff data, and publicly branded critics as agents of hostile foreign interests. Established organisations have shut down as a result, and only about a third of regional community groups active in 2024 were still operating a year later. Taking part in civic life has also become risky. Protesters face heavy fines, up to 60 days’ detention and now criminal charges.
Civic Environment Report 2026: Georgia
Hostile
| Standard | Score | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| Cluster A — Institutional and Political Environment and Narratives of CSOs | 1.2 | cluster average |
| A1 Equal treatment | 1 | Restrictive |
| A2 Political recognition as partners | 1 | Restrictive |
| A3 Refrained authorities from smearing | 1 | Restrictive |
| A4 No weaponization of state powers and good governance principles | 1 | Restrictive |
| A5 Transparent and open public institutions | 2 | Restrictive leaning |
| Cluster B — Legal and Financial Framework for CSOs | 1.4 | cluster average |
| B1 Free establishment and operation | 2 | Restrictive leaning |
| B2 CSOs enjoy a safe space and protection from arbitrariness | 1 | Restrictive |
| B3 Liberality of resourcing | 1 | Restrictive |
| B4 Enabling fiscal environment | 2 | Restrictive leaning |
| B5 Free expressions of criticism | 1 | Restrictive |
| Cluster C — Public Engagement and Perceptions towards the Work of CSOs | 1.6 | cluster average |
| C1 Citizens' trust | 2 | Restrictive leaning |
| C2 Pluralistic presentation in media | 2 | Restrictive leaning |
| C3 Free engagement | 1 | Restrictive |
| C4 CSOs embedded in communities | 2 | Restrictive leaning |
| C5 Freedom of assembly | 1 | Restrictive |
| Cluster D — CSOs as Policy Makers | 1 | cluster average |
| D1 Right to participate in decision-making including in the policy cycle | 1 | Restrictive |
| D2 Timely consultations and equal participation | 1 | Restrictive |
| D3 Policies encourage cooperation with CSOs | 1 | Restrictive |
| D4 Free advocacy and watchdogging | 1 | Restrictive |
| D5 Government listens | 1 | Restrictive |
| Composite index (average of cluster scores) | 1.3 | between restrictive and restrictive leaning |