editorial partner Liberte! Friedrich Naumann Foundation

Civic Environment Report 2026: Slovakia

Mixed – Restrictive Leaning

Since late 2023, Robert Fico’s government has openly targeted critical civil society, independent media and the opposition. Between January 2025 and June 2026, senior officials repeatedly cast NGOs as “foreign mercenaries” and enemies of the state, and in early 2025 even linked them to an alleged coup plot. The ruling party paid for most of the attack advertising against NGOs and journalists on social media. Around €15–16 million in public funding for human rights, culture and environmental organisations was cut or withheld. A 2025 law requiring NGOs to disclose their donors, which activists call the “Russian law”, was struck down by the Constitutional Court. The government then responded with sweeping audits, inspections and criminal investigations against selected organisations. Core freedoms remain legally protected, and the courts continue to act as a real check. Slovakians still give, volunteer and protest in large numbers. Pressure has also pushed CSOs closer together and closer to municipalities, businesses and independent media.

Standard Score Rating
Cluster A — Institutional and Political Environment and Narratives of CSOs 1.8 Restrictive leaning cluster average
A1 Equal treatment 2 Restrictive leaning
A2 Political recognition as partners 2 Restrictive leaning
A3 Refrained authorities from smearing 1 Restrictive
A4 No weaponization of state powers and good governance principles 2 Restrictive leaning
A5 Transparent and open public institutions 2 Restrictive leaning
Cluster B — Legal and Financial Framework for CSOs 2.8 Mostly enabling cluster average
B1 Free establishment and operation 3 Mostly enabling
B2 CSOs enjoy a safe space and protection from arbitrariness 3 Mostly enabling
B3 Liberality of resourcing 2 Restrictive leaning
B4 Enabling fiscal environment 3 Mostly enabling
B5 Free expressions of criticism 3 Mostly enabling
Cluster C — Public Engagement and Perceptions towards the Work of CSOs 2.8 Mostly enabling cluster average
C1 Citizens' trust 3 Mostly enabling
C2 Pluralistic presentation in media 2 Restrictive leaning
C3 Free engagement 3 Mostly enabling
C4 CSOs embedded in communities 3 Mostly enabling
C5 Freedom of assembly 3 Mostly enabling
Cluster D — CSOs as Policy Makers 2 Restrictive leaning cluster average
D1 Right to participate in decision-making including in the policy cycle 2 Restrictive leaning
D2 Timely consultations and equal participation 2 Restrictive leaning
D3 Policies encourage cooperation with CSOs 2 Restrictive leaning
D4 Free advocacy and watchdogging 3 Mostly enabling
D5 Government listens 1 Restrictive
Composite index (average of cluster scores) 2.35 between restrictive leaning and mostly enabling