Poland stands at a decisive moment in the debate over legal recognition for same-sex couples. After years of political stalemate and institutional resistance, a shift in parliamentary power in 2023 created renewed momentum for reform. The emergence of a broad democratic coalition — spanning from the left to the centre-right — has reopened legislative space for civil unions. Yet political realignment alone does not guarantee success. The current stage of the debate reveals both opportunity and fragility.
Within the governing coalition, support for civil unions is substantial but not unanimous. The Civic Coalition and the New Left openly back the introduction of legal recognition for same-sex partnerships. A more cautious partner has adopted a neutral stance, while the conservative Polish People’s Party (PSL) has expressed reservations. This internal tension initially stalled progress, even after the appointment of Poland’s first Equality Minister and the presentation of a draft bill.
The 2025 presidential election marked a turning point. Lower mobilisation among pro-reform voters contributed to the victory of Karol Nawrocki, a candidate associated with the conservative camp. The result underscored the political cost of inaction and served as a wake-up call for the coalition. Negotiations resumed, culminating in a compromise draft presented in October 2025.
The new proposal is deliberately framed as pragmatic and “free from ideology.” It avoids explicit references to “civil unions,” instead introducing a legal status for partnerships between two unmarried adults, regardless of gender. The draft provides rights in taxation, inheritance, healthcare decision-making and access to information, while excluding joint adoption — a concession intended to secure broader parliamentary support and reduce the likelihood of a presidential veto.
Public opinion suggests that such a calibrated approach may resonate with society. Surveys indicate that approximately two-thirds of Poles support some form of legal recognition for same-sex couples, with support divided between marriage equality and alternative legal arrangements. While adoption rights remain more contested, the overall trend points toward gradual acceptance rather than entrenched opposition. Notably, the electorate appears nearly evenly split on whether the President should sign a civil-unions bill — highlighting the political sensitivity of the moment.
International obligations further shape the debate. The European Court of Human Rights has ruled that Poland must provide effective legal protection for same-sex couples. The form of that protection is left to the state, but inaction is no longer legally sustainable. Domestic constitutional arguments — particularly those invoking Article 18 — have been partially reframed by court rulings clarifying that the Constitution does not automatically preclude broader recognition if legislated.
The central strategic question is no longer whether reform is possible, but how it should be sequenced. A maximalist approach risks veto and polarisation. A narrow, carefully designed civil-unions law may function as a first step — establishing legal certainty in core areas of daily life while building institutional and social familiarity. Presenting reform as a pro-family, stability-enhancing measure — rather than an ideological breakthrough — increases the likelihood of cross-party acceptance.
However, legal recognition alone will not resolve the broader challenges faced by LGBTIQ+ people in Poland. Hate speech, discrimination in employment and education, mental health disparities and social exclusion require coordinated responses across sectors. Civil-union legislation should therefore be embedded in a longer-term strategy encompassing education policy, healthcare access, anti-discrimination enforcement and public communication.
The revival of the civil-union debate reflects more than a technical legislative dispute. It signals a test of Poland’s democratic resilience: whether political actors can translate evolving public attitudes into durable institutional change. The coming months will determine whether compromise legislation becomes a stepping stone toward fuller equality — or another stalled reform in a long legislative history.
This article draws on the analysis presented in Same-Sex Marriage: From Fragmented Progress to a Shared European Commitment to Equality, offering a preview of the broader arguments developed in the publication.
Continue exploring:
Liberal Solutions to US Interference in Europe’s Digital Space