EU Must Innovate
Everyone would be better off if the European Commission started innovating its own policy and went by the principle „Less harmonisation, more competition“
Everyone would be better off if the European Commission started innovating its own policy and went by the principle „Less harmonisation, more competition“
This is not to say that the gun debate ends here for me. It doesn’t. It actually starts here.
This revolution has not been hampered by the economic crisis. It is going on. This year alone seven countries are going to reduce the profit tax.
Ukrainians today are more serious about liberal democracy than many Europeans have been for a long time. The traditional values of Europe – self-reliance, self-determination – today are much stronger in the Maidan square than in parts of, say, Greece.
The question is whether the new policies drive the banking sector closer to the market and market laws or, on the contrary, estrange it from them?
Here you are – XXI century, modern-day Poland: the smartest minds of the Catholic Church care about preventing the spread of the disease called gender theory, or as they refer to it – gender ideology, as they proclaim it is not compatible with the scientific standards at all.
The analysis deals with various regulatory problems from five main areas – banking, interchange fees, energy, personal data protection and common agricultural policy.
Not even government subventions can help the sinking Peugeot, so the company has to be rescued by a Chinese partner.
Since it is wise to direct resources to a productive and prospective use, our energy should be channelled into the future, instead of prolonging the agony of the failures from the past.
Instead of opening their borders to producers (mainly farmers) from the developing countries, they send them international development aid, while unwilling to acknowledge that 75 percent of these funds end up in the pockets of the local politicians and bureaucrats (…).