editorial partner Liberte! Friedrich Naumann Foundation

Civic Environment Report 2026: Poland

Enabling

Poland’s civic space has opened up considerably since the change of government in late 2023. This report looks at 2025–2026 and finds that the pressure independent organisations faced in earlier years has largely stopped. Government rhetoric no longer stigmatises CSOs, loyal organisations are no longer favoured, public funding is more transparent, and civic groups can criticise, campaign and protest freely.

The progress still rests more on political will than on lasting guarantees, though. Many reform pledges are unfulfilled, and the Minister for Civil Society post was abolished in 2025. Consultations are often late or tokenistic, especially on migration, and access to public information is still patchy. Many organisations remain financially fragile. Groups working on migration, LGBTQI+ and reproductive rights are the most exposed, now mainly to hostility from opposition politicians and partisan media.

Standard Score Rating
Cluster A — Institutional and Political Environment and Narratives of CSOs 3.6 Enabling cluster average
A1 Equal treatment 4 Enabling
A2 Political recognition as partners 3 Mostly enabling
A3 Refrained authorities from smearing 4 Enabling
A4 No weaponization of state powers and good governance principles 4 Enabling
A5 Transparent and open public institutions 3 Mostly enabling
Cluster B — Legal and Financial Framework for CSOs 3.8 Enabling cluster average
B1 Free establishment and operation 4 Enabling
B2 CSOs enjoy a safe space and protection from arbitrariness 4 Enabling
B3 Liberality of resourcing 4 Enabling
B4 Enabling fiscal environment 3 Mostly enabling
B5 Free expressions of criticism 4 Enabling
Cluster C — Public Engagement and Perceptions towards the Work of CSOs 3.6 Enabling cluster average
C1 Citizens' trust 3 Mostly enabling
C2 Pluralistic presentation in media 4 Enabling
C3 Free engagement 4 Enabling
C4 CSOs embedded in communities 3 Mostly enabling
C5 Freedom of assembly 4 Enabling
Cluster D — CSOs as Policy Makers 3 Mostly enabling cluster average
D1 Right to participate in decision-making including in the policy cycle 3 Mostly enabling
D2 Timely consultations and equal participation 3 Mostly enabling
D3 Policies encourage cooperation with CSOs 3 Mostly enabling
D4 Free advocacy and watchdogging 3 Mostly enabling
D5 Government listens 3 Mostly enabling
Composite index (average of cluster scores) 3.5 between mostly enabling and enabling
Download full report (PDF)